PLR Copper Mine revamp

What is your latest project?
User avatar
SimonWood
Trainee Driver
Trainee Driver
Posts: 801
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2015 9:46 pm
Location: West Wales
Contact:

Re: PLR Copper Mine revamp

Post by SimonWood » Thu Aug 27, 2026 11:37 am

Well now you've made it look like that's something even I might manage... I'm going to have a rethink of my tipper methodology! They're just regular Binnies up top doing the tipping?
Rheilffordd Moel Rhos: blog - photos - videos

User avatar
ge_rik
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 7980
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:20 pm
Location: Cheshire
Contact:

Re: PLR Copper Mine revamp

Post by ge_rik » Thu Aug 27, 2026 2:14 pm

SimonWood wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2026 11:37 am They're just regular Binnies up top doing the tipping?
Absolutely. No modifications - just as they come (as long as you've not glued the buckets to the wagon chassis).

Rik
------------------------
Peckforton Light Railway - Blog Facebook Youtube

User avatar
GTB
Driver
Driver
Posts: 1712
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 2:46 pm
Location: Australia

Re: PLR Copper Mine revamp

Post by GTB » Fri Aug 28, 2026 2:56 am

ge_rik wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2026 8:51 am BTW - I found a simple but reasonably effective way of tipping the skips.
That's the best type of mechanical engineering design, it uses the minimum number of moving parts............

Would a common carrier like the PLR have allowed v-skips on their 'mainline'? In Aust. they were known as 'tumbling tommies' for good reason.

Graeme

User avatar
ge_rik
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 7980
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:20 pm
Location: Cheshire
Contact:

Re: PLR Copper Mine revamp

Post by ge_rik » Fri Aug 28, 2026 7:44 am

GTB wrote: Fri Aug 28, 2026 2:56 am
ge_rik wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2026 8:51 am BTW - I found a simple but reasonably effective way of tipping the skips.
That's the best type of mechanical engineering design, it uses the minimum number of moving parts............

Would a common carrier like the PLR have allowed v-skips on their 'mainline'? In Aust. they were known as 'tumbling tommies' for good reason.

Graeme
Good point. Mind you, operations on the PLR are fairly lax so I think they might get away with it. I'm basing operations loosely on the Southwold. They resisted having continuous braking and didn't possess a brake van so their mixed trains ran without a brake van at the rear. I'm hoping the relatively relaxed protocols of the Light Railways Act would allow them to get away with all sorts..... :dontknow:

Rik
------------------------
Peckforton Light Railway - Blog Facebook Youtube

User avatar
philipy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 6038
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:00 pm
Location: South Northants

Re: PLR Copper Mine revamp

Post by philipy » Fri Aug 28, 2026 8:59 am

ge_rik wrote: Fri Aug 28, 2026 7:44 am I'm hoping the relatively relaxed protocols of the Light Railways Act would allow them to get away with all sorts..... :dontknow:

Rik
Your railway, your rules, and and anyway I'm sure that somewhere there is an obscure amendment to the Act that would allow it in your case! :lol:
Philip

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests