Re: Weak Bachmann Lyn motor
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2021 7:06 pm
Well done Rik. That looks fine ( weird as an 0-4-0 ) but fine. 
An international forum for garden railway modellers in all scales and gauges. It is free to join and is funded through voluntary contributions by its members. Many thanks to all those who keep it going.
https://gardenrails.org/forum/
It reminds me of one of those Hornby tinplate clockwork locos which I used to have running at full pelt on the sitting room carpet as a kid .... My first train set!philipy wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 7:06 pm Well done Rik. That looks fine ( weird as an 0-4-0 ) but fine.![]()
I thought that thing looked like it had been butchered to fit a different motor. You're more patient than me, I'd have long since given it a burial at sea by tossing it off the end of the local pier.......ge_rik wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 6:33 pm I think I have identified the problem and fixed it (let's hope that's not famous last words!).
I might try that, using a longer piece of copper tube and then only reaming out half of it...Lonsdaler wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 11:47 am Congratulations on getting this far Rik. I can't offer any expert advice on positioning/meshing of worm gearing, but from my model boating days, I used to extend motor shafts by fitting an 'interference fit' piece of brass tubing over the exposed motor shaft, and then used the OD of that tubing to size other necessary components. Not sure if that would be any help to you, but I look forward to seeing your progress![]()
Or perhaps one of the expert engineers amonst our members might volunteer to turn you a nice extension sleeve, rather than relying on files and hand drills.ge_rik wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 12:29 pmI might try that, using a longer piece of copper tube and then only reaming out half of it...Lonsdaler wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 11:47 am Congratulations on getting this far Rik. I can't offer any expert advice on positioning/meshing of worm gearing, but from my model boating days, I used to extend motor shafts by fitting an 'interference fit' piece of brass tubing over the exposed motor shaft, and then used the OD of that tubing to size other necessary components. Not sure if that would be any help to you, but I look forward to seeing your progress![]()
Rik
Only if I can charge realistically for the hours I put into sorting them out ......
ge_rik wrote: Thu Jun 10, 2021 6:14 pmOnly if I can charge realistically for the hours I put into sorting them out ......![]()
Rik
Yes, that's the long and the short of it. A bit hit and miss making sure the gears mesh correctly. As the motor block housing is closed, it's not possible to see the gears or make adjustments. I'm now on my fourth variation..... Way one takes around 18 hours to print....RobRossington wrote: Mon Jun 14, 2021 11:09 am Looking at it would I be right in saying that your new motor block has the motor sat lower so that the new smaller worms can reach the axle gears?
At the risk of asking a stupid question, would it be possible to print a small window in one side of the housing, just large enough to see the mesh?ge_rik wrote: Mon Jun 14, 2021 8:20 pm As the motor block housing is closed, it's not possible to see the gears or make adjustments.
I'm fairly sure you can get transparent PLA filament. Print the test housings using that.......ge_rik wrote: Mon Jun 14, 2021 8:20 pm Yes, that's the long and the short of it. A bit hit and miss making sure the gears mesh correctly. As the motor block housing is closed, it's not possible to see the gears or make adjustments. I'm now on my fourth variation..... Way one takes around 18 hours to print....
Yes you can get transparent PLA, and I did think about suggesting it, but in my limited experience, "translucent" is more accurate than transparent. I used it for the 'glass' in my platform lamps and its fine with a bright LED inside but not really see-through. It may be possible to improve the clarity by fiddling about with settings, but that would take longer, with uncertain end result, than the hit and miss approach anyway, I'm afraid.GTB wrote: Tue Jun 15, 2021 5:38 am
I'm fairly sure you can get transparent PLA filament. Print the test housings using that.......
........You'll probably need to hold everything up against a bright light to see the silhouette of the gears and there'll be so much distortion it will be like trying to read a newspaper through the bottom of a beer glass. Still a lot better than printing bits 'ad nauseum' until you get a gearbox that seems to work.....
I also thought about whether a multi-piece housing might be a better proposition. Basically a two piece assembly to carry the motor,with separate gear boxes at each end that carry the axles/worm wheel and can be adjusted up and down.ge_rik wrote: Tue Jun 15, 2021 7:49 am If my mk IV version doesn't work, I might try designing either a moveable cradle for the motor or moveable mounts for the wheel bearings.
I'm not particularly surprised. If I'd thought about it, that printing process is bound to have tiny voids and bubbles dispersed through the part, even if the filament is transparent.philipy wrote: Tue Jun 15, 2021 6:09 am Yes you can get transparent PLA, and I did think about suggesting it, but in my limited experience, "translucent" is more accurate than transparent.
That's a good idea. The stub axles have an additional socketed square section on their ends which fit into square holes in the worm wheels. Quite a complex bit of engineering.GTB wrote: Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:17 pm In the case of the wheels getting in the way of seeing the gear mesh, replace them with a simple temporary axle the same dia. while doing the adjustment. Doesn't have to be metal, even a suitable plastic tube would do the job. You might even be able to print something suitable, as all it has to do is pass through the bearings and the bore of the worm wheel to line them up.
Graeme