The continuious quiz

This is the place to talk about news, TV, music and other hobbies
Post Reply
MDLR

Post by MDLR » Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:51 pm

I'm thinking signal box bell codes - the first two would "tie together" but I don't know 13....................

Marquis DeCarabas

Post by Marquis DeCarabas » Sun Apr 15, 2012 11:30 pm

MDLR:69768 wrote:I'm thinking signal box bell codes - the first two would "tie together" but I don't know 13....................
Not bell codes, I'm afraid.

Marquis DeCarabas

Post by Marquis DeCarabas » Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:50 am

24h no other response. Time for a clue.

A clue: Always 8 in total, to begin with 4 followed; then 4 could push (or pull) and 4 could pull (or push) but eventually 8 are still and 4 follow again at 13 rather than 12.

Looking for a one word answer.

MDLR

Post by MDLR » Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:13 am

Anything to do with campanology?

Marquis DeCarabas

Post by Marquis DeCarabas » Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:15 am

MDLR:69840 wrote:Anything to do with campanology?
Only insofar as this particular one didn't have a bell!

MDLR

Post by MDLR » Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:32 am

Did any of the others?

Marquis DeCarabas

Post by Marquis DeCarabas » Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:58 am

MDLR:69842 wrote:Did any of the others?
Yes; but not the one or ones in the question.

Marquis DeCarabas

Post by Marquis DeCarabas » Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:56 pm

Time for another clue, I'm afraid.

Same name; three different versions.

Marquis DeCarabas

Post by Marquis DeCarabas » Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:45 pm

Any takers - I'm off-net for a bit from tomorrow afternoon: so get your guesses in quick!

You'll all kick yourselves.. Very famous 'thing'.

TommyDodd

Post by TommyDodd » Fri Apr 20, 2012 12:12 am

Taliesin?

Marquis DeCarabas

Post by Marquis DeCarabas » Fri Apr 20, 2012 2:30 am

TommyDodd:69952 wrote:Taliesin?
Yes. For the benefit of others:
Marquis DeCarabas:69756 wrote:What am I?

Began at 9; finished at 7; once-twice-once; now 13.
First number was 9, renumbered to 7 when 'Little Wonder' curled up its tyres and went to the Great Ironworks.

once-twice-once = single/double/single fairlie

now 13 - the modern Taliesin is built at 13 inches to the foot.
Marquis DeCarabas:69835 wrote: A clue: Always 8 in total, to begin with 4 followed; then 4 could push (or pull) and 4 could pull (or push) but eventually 8 are still and 4 follow again at 13 rather than 12.
Taliesin was originally a single engine 0-4-4T in Whyte notation with one power bogie and one trailing bogie; after a hard life as the 'gentleman's  light sporting locomotive' Taliesin I was 'retired' c.1927 and dismantled  in 1932. Taliesin II (formerly Livingston Thompson) emerged on 3rd June 1932 (learnt that last week), which of course was a double engine 0-4-4-0T in Whyte notation. 8 and 4 are the number of wheels unlike the Whyte system that counts axles.

Eventually the 8 being still = preservation, another change of name and then 'stuffing' in Ebor.

The 4 follow again at 13 rather than 12 = new size and trailing bogie - Taliesin III
Marquis DeCarabas:69895 wrote:Same name; three different versions.
That should be obvious now! And the bells - well, I think James Spooner was the last one with a bell from new.

TommyDodd

Post by TommyDodd » Fri Apr 20, 2012 12:09 pm

Look for me out of the window if you ever ride the Orient Express. I might be making steam, though I'm not a steamer. I've had five careful owners in two countries, though I've always worked on the same railway and it doesn't cross any borders. I wasn't the first to work here, though I have done for a century with the aid of a facelift after 50 years. They tried to replace me 20 years ago, but I'm still here hard at work all year round.

Pretoria

Post by Pretoria » Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:25 pm


TommyDodd

Post by TommyDodd » Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:27 pm

Interesting, but no.

Pretoria

Post by Pretoria » Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:39 pm


TommyDodd

Post by TommyDodd » Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:45 pm

Like the way you think. Think consumer, not producer.

TommyDodd

Post by TommyDodd » Sat Apr 21, 2012 11:56 am

No more bites? Time for a little help.

Fifteen out of sixteen.

Twelve that look like sixteen.

TommyDodd

Post by TommyDodd » Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:02 pm

3 days and not a bite? Time for another clue, methinks. Sorry it wasn't done quicker, but this was my on-call weekend.

Image

Of course this may be giving it away to the google-fiends, but WTH, somebody's got to get it eventually.

MDLR

Post by MDLR » Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:32 pm

(sound of it going TOTALLY over his head..................)

TommyDodd

Post by TommyDodd » Wed Apr 25, 2012 6:17 pm

Another day, another clue


Image

Sorry guys. I'm honestly not trying to create "Mission Impossible" questions. I just have broad tastes in narrow gauge.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests