PLR Copper Mine revamp

What is your latest project?
User avatar
SimonWood
Trainee Driver
Trainee Driver
Posts: 801
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2015 9:46 pm
Location: West Wales
Contact:

Re: PLR Copper Mine revamp

Post by SimonWood » Thu Aug 27, 2026 11:37 am

Well now you've made it look like that's something even I might manage... I'm going to have a rethink of my tipper methodology! They're just regular Binnies up top doing the tipping?
Rheilffordd Moel Rhos: blog - photos - videos

User avatar
ge_rik
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 7986
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:20 pm
Location: Cheshire
Contact:

Re: PLR Copper Mine revamp

Post by ge_rik » Thu Aug 27, 2026 2:14 pm

SimonWood wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2026 11:37 am They're just regular Binnies up top doing the tipping?
Absolutely. No modifications - just as they come (as long as you've not glued the buckets to the wagon chassis).

Rik
------------------------
Peckforton Light Railway - Blog Facebook Youtube

User avatar
GTB
Driver
Driver
Posts: 1712
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 2:46 pm
Location: Australia

Re: PLR Copper Mine revamp

Post by GTB » Fri Aug 28, 2026 2:56 am

ge_rik wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2026 8:51 am BTW - I found a simple but reasonably effective way of tipping the skips.
That's the best type of mechanical engineering design, it uses the minimum number of moving parts............

Would a common carrier like the PLR have allowed v-skips on their 'mainline'? In Aust. they were known as 'tumbling tommies' for good reason.

Graeme

User avatar
ge_rik
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 7986
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:20 pm
Location: Cheshire
Contact:

Re: PLR Copper Mine revamp

Post by ge_rik » Fri Aug 28, 2026 7:44 am

GTB wrote: Fri Aug 28, 2026 2:56 am
ge_rik wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2026 8:51 am BTW - I found a simple but reasonably effective way of tipping the skips.
That's the best type of mechanical engineering design, it uses the minimum number of moving parts............

Would a common carrier like the PLR have allowed v-skips on their 'mainline'? In Aust. they were known as 'tumbling tommies' for good reason.

Graeme
Good point. Mind you, operations on the PLR are fairly lax so I think they might get away with it. I'm basing operations loosely on the Southwold. They resisted having continuous braking and didn't possess a brake van so their mixed trains ran without a brake van at the rear. I'm hoping the relatively relaxed protocols of the Light Railways Act would allow them to get away with all sorts..... :dontknow:

Rik
------------------------
Peckforton Light Railway - Blog Facebook Youtube

User avatar
philipy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 6040
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:00 pm
Location: South Northants

Re: PLR Copper Mine revamp

Post by philipy » Fri Aug 28, 2026 8:59 am

ge_rik wrote: Fri Aug 28, 2026 7:44 am I'm hoping the relatively relaxed protocols of the Light Railways Act would allow them to get away with all sorts..... :dontknow:

Rik
Your railway, your rules, and and anyway I'm sure that somewhere there is an obscure amendment to the Act that would allow it in your case! :lol:
Philip

User avatar
ge_rik
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 7986
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:20 pm
Location: Cheshire
Contact:

Re: PLR Copper Mine revamp

Post by ge_rik » Mon Aug 31, 2026 6:49 pm

Normally, my videos get around 1500 and occasionally 2000 hits. But, for some reason, the video of the copper mine has suddenly reached the heady heights of 17000 hits.

No idea why. As far as I can see, there's no click-bait included in the video...... :shock: :lol:

Rik
------------------------
Peckforton Light Railway - Blog Facebook Youtube

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests